NWO Conspiracy Theory, New World Order,| 2012 End Times News

National Defense Authorization Act 2012 NDAA Blocked By Federal Judge Katherine Forrest Why Not Impose Title 18 USC Section 241.  Nah, There is No NWO Conspiracy. The New World Order is a Farse and there are no Conspiracies to take Our Rights. I suggest you Read on.

Before we get into the Landmark Ruling that the NDAA is Unconstitutional I might tell you why I noted Title 18 USC Section 241. 

Let’s take a look at what is has to say, and say it does. I feel every signer of this Nefarious NDAA National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 should be charged with it’s violation and prosecuted, utilizing due process of course.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).

It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.

See my point, are they not or would they not be guilty if they were to actually carry this NDAA out on a Citizen? Or does it being law, already classify it as conspiring? I am no lawyer. It is a question to you readers and law buffs.

NDAA Unconstitutional 

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA) deserves enormous attention and debate. After all the blogs that have posted on this topic, I feel as a citizen, obligated to follow suite for widest dissemination. admittedly, there are several nefarious pieces of legislation which authorize much of what HR Bill 1540 and S. Bill 1867  ”National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012″ authorizes, such as the infamous Patriot Act and Several Executive orders placed into public law by Bush and former presidents.

This is not new, each one simply strengthens and codifies the other. Building a maze or web of laws that would take 20 New York Lawyers to untangle, let alone initiate any sort of litigation against or for any sort of repeal be undertaken on the part of Congress, which I highly doubt would ever come to fruition. Even if you handed them the blatant facts, and the exact methods to take, being that they seem to be complicit (95%) regardless of the scarce murmur or chest beating.

We must understand that as it is with any country or if we look back in history, you always have the few politicians who by design will rise up and make a fuss to appease the people who have been shaken from their slumber. Once the awakened, programmed citizens or subjects become aware that there is in fact an elected official rising up to fight the battle, whatever that may be. The programmed citizen returns to his/her comatose slumber, feeling that all is well, and that the politician elected to represent them, and to protect the Constitution (which they have taken an oath to do, I leave out Solemn as I doubt you could muster much earnestness of sober thought out of D.C.), but the citizen feels the elected official has all in control.

In fact that is exactly what and how it should be. Many times, I feel that the elected official needs no onslaught of calls, faxes, emails or whatever to alert him or her to the fact that there is legislation contrary to our “Representative Republic”. We do not have a damn Democracy as so many in D.C. and even citizens often call it. I am sick of hearing it! Our founding fathers feared a true democracy. A true democracy is for the majority and the individuals rights and liberties are left in the dust, and or trampled upon to appease and satisfy the majority. Never the less, the awaken citizen sees a politician making a fuss and feels at ease, and returns to thier original stuptification (if that’s a word, if not I just made it one. Why not, Washington makes it up as they go along, why not I?).

I will make mention of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA) due to it’s immense importance, and in hopes you will verify my provided documentation. 

On the matter of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 – NDAA

A New York District Court has ruled portions of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA) as UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Specifically section 1021. Please do not get confused here. It can be confusing the way many are reporting it. The House version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA) is H.R. Bill 1540 and the Senate version is S. 1867. I will provide all the official links for you. To view each version simply click on them. I will also provide a link to the ruling proclaiming the noted sections UNCONSTITUTIONAL. 

S Bill 1867  In Full See Subtitle D–Detainee Matters – Sec. 1031 And 1032 S. Bill 1867 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 – In Full to View Section 1031 Once There Scroll To Subtitle D–Detainee Matters – Sec. 1031 And 1032

HR 1540 in full See Subtitle D–Counterterrorism – Sec. 1021. HR Bill 1540 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 – In Full For Section 1021 Once There Scroll Down To Subtitle D–Counterterrorism – Sec. 1021.

PDF To Official Court Ruling at end

Moving along. Judge Katherine Forrest had the integrity, courage, and legal intellect, and apparently the Patriotism to deem Sections 1021 of HR 1540 and even though not noted in the ruling, it affects it the same,  Section 1031 and Section 1032 of S. 1867, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and to rule in the favor of the plaintiffs.

Press Now! Vote NWO Conspiracy As Top Lists

The Plaintiffs

Seven Plaintiffs as follows; Noam Chomsky, Noam Chomsky is a Cognitive Scientist, American linguist, philosopher, historian, and activist. He us currently a Professor Emeritus in the Department of Linguistics & Philosophy at MIT. According to the Arts and Humanities Citation Index in 1992, Chomsky was cited as a source more often than any other living scholar from 1980 to 1992. 

Chris Hedges – Journalist, Best Selling Author, and War Correspondent, Specializing in American and Middle Eastern Politics and Societies. In 2002, Hedges was part of the team of reporters at The New York Times awarded the Pulitzer Prize for the paper’s coverage of global terrorism. He also received in 2002 the Amnesty International Global Award for Human Rights Journalism. He has taught at Columbia University, New York University, Princeton University and The University of Toronto. 

Daniel Ellsberg - Former Military Analyst, noted for releasing the Top Secret Pentagon Papers in 1971. Mr. Ellsberg is publicly supporting PFC Bradley Manning, and has been subjected to arrest at protests. He is 81 years old. Mr. Ellsberg was awarded the Right Livelihood Award in 2006. He is one of the most highly lauded government whistle-blowers in US history. 

Birgitta Jónsdóttir, Birgitta Jónsdóttir is a member of the Icelandic Parliament, elected on behalf of a movement aiming for democratic reform beyond party politics of left and right. She was the chief sponsor of the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative (IMMI) – a parliamentary resolution tasking the government to create a new legislative means to protect and strengthen modern freedom of expression. Ms. Jonsdottir is working with the European Union on modeling legislation after IMMI. Her brief work with the organization WikiLeaks led to a Department of Justice subpoena on her Twitter account, which in turn led the Icelandic Foreign Affairs Ministry to strongly recommend she not attempt travel to the United States. 

Jennifer “Tangerine” Bolen, Jennifer “Tangerine” Bolen is the founder and Executive Director of RevolutionTruth, an organization dedicated to restoring legitimate democracies in part through increasing access to accurate information. She has led campaigns in support of WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning, and hosts online panel discussions on complex issues. RevolutionTruth’s new panel series of discussions between activists in the West and Middle East is geared toward sharing knowledge, challenging War-on-Terror-aggravated stereotypes, and building worldwide networks of support between those working on ensuring accountable, transparent and democratic governance. 

Kai Wargalla, Kai Wargalla is a student and activist who is involved in the Occupy Movement, and in campaigns supporting WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning with RevolutionTruth. She organized and is co-founder of the Facebook and Twitter accounts that sparked Occupy London (OSLX) and has been involved in multiple court cases with OSLX against The City of London and other entities. The Occupy London movement has been officially listed as ‘Domestic Terrorism/Extremism’ by the City of London Police Department, subsequently endangering Ms. Wargalla under the 2012 NDAA. 

Alexa ’Brien, Alexa O’Brien has designed digital content strategy solutions for international governmental organizations and Fortune 500 companies. She founded usdayofrage.org, which endorsed and helped organize the September 17 action to Occupy Wall Street. She has covered WikiLeaks releases and revolutions across Egypt, Bahrain, Iran, and Yemen, as well as Bradley Manning. DHS memos sent to law enforcement across the country stated organizers of US Day of Rage were likely high level cyber terrorists. The media followed suit, publishing those allegations and others, including the groups alleged association with Al Qaeda, jeopardizing Ms. O’Brien’s career, her standing in her community, and her liberty under the 2012 NDAA. 

The Plaintiffs are represented by Civil Rights Attorney Bruce Afran and Co-Counsel Carl Mayer .

Judge Katherine Forrest said this provision is overbroad. Judge Forrest said it clearly embraces speech, even if it doesn’t intend to. And Judge Forrest criticized the government severely, because it refused to acknowledge in court that First Amendment activities would not bring someone into a state of indefinite detention. And five times, Judge Forrest asked the U.S. attorney, [Quote] “Will you agree that First Amendment activities will not bring someone under the scope of this law?”[Unquote] And the government five times said, [Quote]“We can’t answer that question.”[Unquote]

Here is a link ot the official ruling on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 by the New York District Court, Judge Katherine Forrest: NDAA Unconstitutional | Hedges v. Obama | Official Ruling

What we are witnessing, I hope what we almost witnessed, as it is not over yet was a direct conspiracy on part of our Congress to obliterate the US Constitution and you/our 1st amendment right and right to due process of law. A Conspiracy Theory has been made to be associated with nutters and cooks and those with tin foil hats. All by design so you stay asleep while a few conquer all and relieve you of your God given inalienable rights. Keep on, keeping on, and one day as one of our founding fathers said:

“If the American people ever allow private banks
to control the issue of their money,
first by inflation and then by deflation,
the banks and corporations that will
grow up around them (around the banks),
will deprive the people of their property
until their children will wake up homeless
on the continent their fathers conquered.”

by: Thomas Jefferson
(1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President

May God Bless Us All

Return To The Home Page For More NWO Conspiracy New World Order Non-Sense Right?

Tags: 2012, Alexa 'Brien, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, Bruce Afran, Carl Mayer, Chris Hedges, Conpiracies, Conspiracy Theory, Constitution, Court Ruling, Daniel Ellsberg, Executive orders, Federal Court Ruling, Federal Judge, First Amendment, Founding Fathers, HR Bill 1540, Jennifer "Tangerine" Bolen, Judge Katherine Forrest, Kai Wargalla, Katherine Forrest, national defense authorization act, NDAA, NDAA Section 1021, NDAA Unconstitutional, New Nork District Court, New World Order, New World Order Conpiracy, Noam Chomsky, NWO Conspiracy, Patriot Act, S. 1867, Section 1021, Section 1031, theories, Wikileaks